¹ A party may request a review of an award if:

a.

it has subsequently become aware of significant facts or uncovered decisive evidence which it could not have produced in the earlier proceedings despite exercising due diligence; the foregoing does not apply to facts or evidence that came into existence after the award was issued;

b.

criminal proceedings have established that the arbitral award was influenced to the detriment of the party concerned by a felony or misdemeanour, even if no one is convicted by a criminal court; if criminal proceedings are not possible, proof may be provided in some other manner;

c.

a ground for a challenge under Article 180 paragraph 1 letter c only came to light after conclusion of the arbitration proceedings despite exercising due diligence and no other legal remedy is available.

² The request for a review must be filed within 90 days of the grounds for review coming to light. A review may not be requested more than ten years after the award becomes legally binding, except in the case of paragraph 1 letter b.